911 Rush To Judgment

.




The C.I.A., Quantum Surveillance And 9/11


http://911rushtojudgment.blogspot.com/


How the C.I.A. Could and Should Have Prevented the Tragedy of 9/11



Why the C.I.A. Deliberately Sat on Extensive Advance Knowledge of The Worst Foreign Attack on American Soil in U.S. History

Ari Cohen
arizal26@yahoo.com
(12/27/01)


“Forewarned, forearmed.”
—Cervantes





Introduction:


I am a relative of an operative in U.S. intelligence. Below is an essay I hope you can read, The C.I.A., Quantum Surveillance and 9/11. This document describes a secret U.S. intelligence project that has developed a surveillance system that could and should have been used to prevent the attacks of 9/11. The system comes from Project Looking Glass — one of the secret black projects researched at Area 51 in Nevada, and possibly the single biggest secret held by the United States government. The technology developed under this project, classified at 38 levels of Sensitive Compartmentalized Information (S.C.I.) above Top Secret, facilitates surveillance on a whole new level, beyond anything anyone has ever dreamed of before (and far beyond the capabilities of the infamous Echelon surveillance system that has been a target of criticism by the ACLU and its "EchelonWatch" division).

The essay below is derived from unclassified open source information including published leaks as well as published articles in open source scientific journals, plus extensive first hand knowledge from a witness (myself) who took no oath of secrecy.

The efforts to break down the wall of government secrecy on black projects come up against the basic official line that the government has the right to keep these secrets for purposes of "national security." However, on 9/11 the government really did have a legitimate national security interest and, using the quantum-based surveillance technology described below, actually had detailed advance warning of the attacks — and deliberately sat on this information in order to gain vast new funding for the C.I.A. and Pentagon, and a boost to the Bush presidency, in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks. This gives the lie to their claims that they need to keep the secrets for "national security." The one time that these secrets might most have secured the country, they sat on their hands. This is a huge embarrassment to the whole machinery of deceit and lying that runs this country. The document below shows that there is a specific, detailed, credible black project dimension and angle to the events of 9/11, and a huge and discrediting disgrace to the government.


The deepest secrets of government will not be disclosed by five star generals in official press releases on letterhead stationery. Although I am a witness, the fact remains that I am not the only one charging that the secret U.S. intelligence project I describe exists. If I'm wrong, so are a lot of other people including people who have done secret work for the government. And I am a personal witness to this technology. Moreover, I am a witness with an important distinction: Unlike the other leakers, I am a witness that this technology is already out of the research phase and is now fully operational and was so long before 9/11. The document below explains all this. I also clarify many things about this project that the other leakers don't. The document below contains some of the biggest secrets held by the United States government. If I were you I'd want to know. Already I have been harassed, assaulted and threatened for trying to disclose this information. I'm risking a lot coming forward. This of itself should peak your interest. However, unlike many others who disclose government secrets, I am willing to allow my name to be used publicly. You may share the document with anyone you wish.

Following is a summary of what this is all about:

I am a relative of an operative in U.S. intelligence. Because I know about very serious crimes he has committed, I have been harassed and have been under constant surveillance for a very long time, many years. I have collected a great deal of evidence about this, over a hundred pages, police information, photographs and family corroboration. There is no secret about any of this anymore. Portions of this evidence have already been distributed by me all over Capitol Hill.

In 1998, after extensively studying surveillance methods, I managed to evade this surveillance and made it to Capitol Hill to complain about the abuse I have received. Unwilling to back off and concede defeat, the C.I.A. then upped the ante, using against me the most ultra-high-tech surveillance technology, in order to show me that I would henceforward not be able to escape their watchful eye, and therefore had better keep my mouth shut. They used this technology on me very ostentatiously — as a demonstration of prowess. With great craft they were also hoping to discredit my initial, well-supported charges about my relative in the C.I.A. — by forcing on my case an unwanted black project angle.

This surveillance technology, the use of which I have now witnessed repeatedly for years, employs very advanced principles of quantum physics. It is possibly the single biggest secret — the most highly classified item — in the United States government. It literally does for surveillance and intelligence what the atom bomb did for warfare. This surveillance technology is the most perfidious, intrusive surveillance system ever devised. I am a witness that this technology is out of the research phase and is already operational.

Specifically, among other things, this surveillance technology gives U.S. intelligence extraordinary capability in anticipating and forestalling foreign attack. Because of the way it functions it could easily have been used to prevent the 9/11 atrocities. Its existence makes it virtually inevitable that the C.I.A. did in fact know in very great detail what would happen on 9/11, days before the attacks — and could readily have used this warning to stop all the attacks. Only a deliberate decision to sit idly by on and in advance of 9/11 could have allowed the attacks to go forward. You will see this for yourself when you read the document.

Although this technology is currently being used by the C.I.A. for corrupt, petty and self-serving purposes, in the right hands it could, nevertheless, be used for great good, and is a marvel of science on a par with landing a man on the moon.

Although quantum technology is extraordinarily advanced, the role it played on 9/11 is very roughly analogous to the role radar played at the time of the Pearl Harbor attack in 1941. Back then radar was very new and had just been installed in Hawaii. According to some historical accounts, personnel manning the radar sets actually saw the Japanese planes approaching on the screen, but the system was still unfamiliar enough to them that they weren't sure how to interpret what they were seeing. A critical distinction is that quantum surveillance — which has been operational now for several years — is so efficacious — and well-mastered by the government — that the C.I.A.'s idleness on 9/11 can not be dismissed as mere negligence and points directly to a deliberate act on their part.

The document below explains all this in detail. The first half or so of the essay explains the actual physics of the technology — how the technology actually works. You will find this explanation extremely clarifying and fascinating. You will easily understand it if you read consecutively without skimming. I originally wrote the essay for people I met on Capitol Hill. If I had not included the long physics explanation, I do not know if they would have believed me. Mainstream journalists have told me it is extremely well written and clear. Because most people find quantum physics very bewildering, I also begin with what I have been told is a very lucid introduction to quantum physics for the layman. You should be able to understand all this even if you have no science background at all. Quantum physics is disorienting by its very nature. But at most what you will find strange is the physics itself, not the explanation. Just take each paragraph one at a time. If you "think" you understand the paragraph, you do.

The field of quantum physics is enormously (and increasingly) relevant to an understanding of many current issues, including the Strategic Defense Initiative (S.D.I. — "Star Wars"), the canceled Superconducting Super Collider in Texas, the now up and running smaller superconducting ion collider of the Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island, the Wen Ho Lee spy case, issues involving lasers, consumer electronics, experimental computers and many other issues. Military issues increasingly involve quantum physics. Thus, you will find this document extremely relevant and worth reading in many ways. To an ever-growing extent, this new century will be all about quantum physics.

The second half of the essay concerns my actual personal experiences with this technology. You'll need to read the first half to believe the second. The second half reads a bit like a spy novel, but it all really happened. Brace yourself because it is very, very shocking. I suggest you read it sitting down.

The C.I.A.'s motive on 9/11 was very simple: They had their own agenda; by deliberately sitting on their hands the C.I.A. stood to gain tremendously increased funding and power as a result of the 9/11 attacks. And their idleness on 9/11 also greatly boosted the Bush presidency.

Because of its frightful threat to our democratic traditions, it is my hope that as many people as possible will come to understand this technology, its workings and its myriad potential uses to vastly enhance the government's ability to know what people are up to, and to also dramatically assist other more conventional surveillance capabilities, including Echelon. As you will see, this technology is a mortal threat to democracy as we know it. It is urgent that the world and elected legislatures learn the truth. And the world has no right not to know.

(End of Introduction.)






During the Clinton years, Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan stated, "The C.I.A. does things in incredibly complicated ways. You won't know how they do it." In the following pages I'm going to tell you a major portion of how they do it. What you are about to read will shock you. You may find it exceedingly controversial. I'm going to tell you things you don't want to hear. But you have no right not to know.

I am a relative of an operative in U.S. intelligence. Because I know about crimes he has committed, I have been under the most vicious surveillance and harassment. After meticulously studying clandestine methods, I managed in 1998 to evade this surveillance in ways Woodward and Bernstein never dreamed of and made it to Capitol Hill to complain about the harsh treatment I have experienced.

Unwilling to back off and concede defeat, the C.I.A. then upped the ante, using against me the most ultra-secret, ultra-high-tech surveillance technology. They literally leaked to me — repeatedly — the existence of this technology, hoping my knowledge of their capabilities would intimidate me. Honest historians of the C.I.A. will not be surprised. C.I.A. director Allen Dulles, for instance, despite his penchant for the most chilling intrigue, could also be utterly cavalier, egotistically leaking to his "pet" journalists some of the most secret information when it suited him, to flatter and buy them off.

I never took an oath of secrecy. None of the information I am about to share comes from classified sources. It comes from my own personal observation and experiences with a crowd of cutthroats who thought that they could scare and play with me with their high-tech toys. Any crime is theirs, not mine. Much additional information in the following pages comes from already published leaks now available from open sources.

As you will soon see, I have no doubt that the C.I.A. had elaborate, detailed advance knowledge of the events of 9/11, enough to have prevented the entire attack, and the anthrax attacks on Capitol Hill. The C.I.A. did not fail. They deliberately sat mum. They did this to gain vast new funding, power and wire tapping authority, plus more money for the Pentagon — even as they stabbed their own military brothers in the back by allowing the attack on the Pentagon. They got everything they wanted — by stabbing the whole country in the back. They are probably very pleased that they achieved such a vast sea change at a cost of "only" a few thousand American lives.

I want to emphasize that this in no way alters my long-held belief in the justice of war against the sponsors of terror. As many who know me will tell, I have for years criticized what I regard as America's anemic response to Islamic extremism, the use of pin-prick, slap-on-the-wrist operations, the charade of pretending that the Pentagon is an air force. One could almost say you don't use the huge "daisy cutter" bombs to defeat these implacable monsters. You use them to get their attention. The West has misunderstood these extremists for decades, as has the C.I.A., which backed so many of them. Senator Moynihan recognized the greater danger correctly after India and Pakistan both tested nuclear weapons. He stated: "There is now an Islam bomb." I have no objection to war against Islamic terrorism. We should have done it a long time ago. Islamic imperialism goes back centuries. The war is just. But the cold blooded way the C.I.A. got us into it when they could have saved all those lives, will haunt our nation for decades to come.

The surveillance technology the C.I.A. has used on me, and which could and should have prevented the terrorist attacks, is based on principles of quantum mechanics. An understanding of this field is vital to policy makers, helping to clarify such critical issues as the Strategic Defense Initiative (S.D.I.), the canceled Superconducting Super Collider in Texas, the now up-and-running smaller superconducting ion collider of the Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island, the obsession with beefing up security at Los Alamos National Laboratory that was one of the motives in the charges against Chinese scientist Wen Ho Lee, and the federal government's High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) involved in experiments with ionizing the upper atmosphere. Thus, we must begin by first explaining quantum physics. Any way you slice it, you will find the following discussion most relevant. And as you will see, quantum surveillance does for surveillance what the atom bomb did for warfare.




Most people find discussions of quantum physics, or quantum mechanics as it is often called, extremely bewildering, either overly formulaic and technical or overly popularized. In the following pages I will endeavor to arrive at a conceptual "sweet spot" between these two extremes, describing the crux of quantum physics and its key issues in the most concise way possible. If you can find a better short explanation of quantum physics than the one that follows, let me know.

To begin with, there are two broad areas of modern physics: Einsteinian physics and quantum physics. Einsteinian physics deals essentially with the macrocosm — vast stretches of space and distance and extremes of mass and velocity. In contrast, quantum physics deals with the inside of the atom — the microcosm. At the close of the 19th Century, the original Greek conception of the atom as an irreducible, solid, marble-like object, the smallest possible component of matter, began to break down. The solid view of the atom gave way to an increasingly immaterial conception with a multitude of smaller particles possessing strange properties that defied the normal dimensions of matter. The atom itself emerged as being composed mostly of empty space. By the 1930's quantum physicists had outlined the most bizarre and unusual properties of the subatomic world, properties that defied even Einsteinian physics itself, but which are entirely normal for the subatomic microcosm. This does not make quantum physics wrong. It is simply that the macrocosm and microcosm function differently and Einstein himself sought to create a "unified field theory" that would tie both domains together and simultaneously explain all the different forces of nature — gravity, magnetism and so on — as different expressions of a single force or process, but Einstein died before he could achieve this theory.

The central principle of quantum physics is this: Each subatomic particle exhibits at various times two different general modes of behavior, one called "corpuscles" and the other called "waves." When a particle is acting as a "corpuscle" (not to be confused with a blood corpuscle — a completely different meaning of the word) it behaves as a spatially localized package of matter and energy — what most people usually imagine a subatomic particle to be. But when, under various reproducible conditions, a particle behaves as a "wave" (not to be confused with waves of sound or light, again, a different meaning of the term), then the particle spreads out and occupies a much larger (albeit still very tiny) area, often called a "cloud of probability." The latter term implies an analogy to a droplet of water being vaporized into a relatively large cloud of steam.

However, the analogy is only approximate. During "wave" mode, or "wave function" as it is often called, the particle inhabits all points within the cloud area but only in a manner of potential. It is potentially at any location within the "cloud" area. This sounds insubstantial enough, except that on the subatomic level the actual and the potential are strangely transposed. On the subatomic level, the potential is almost as tangible as the actual.

For instance, imagine that you are in your car on your way to visit your Aunt Matilda. Unfortunately, you come to a fork in the road not mentioned in Aunt Matilda's directions. In advance of the fork you pull your car over by the side of the road, open up the glove compartment and try to make sense out of Aunt Matilda's directions. Ahead of you is the fork in the road. You could equally choose to go left or right. Potentially you could go either way. But because you inhabit the normal macrocosmic world, you are not yet in either branch of the fork even though you have the potential to take either route.

However, because the dimensions of matter are distorted on the subatomic realm, if you were a subatomic particle during wave behavior, because the potential and the actual are distorted and transposed, to an extent you would actually be in all three locations simultaneously — ahead of the fork and also in the left fork and also in the right fork. While this would be ridiculous for people and cars, it is normal for subatomic particles during wave mode.

Another example of this odd behavior is the famous "Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle," conceived by physicist and 1932 Nobel laureate Werner Heisenberg. According to this well-established principle, the location and velocity of an electron can be accurately determined only in inverse proportion. That is, the more accurately you pin down the velocity of an electron, the less accurately you can simultaneously pin down the electron's location (and vice versa). As your testing pins down the velocity, the electron's location becomes increasingly plural, a contradictory multitude of potentials or possibilities, sometimes called a "superposition of multiple states."

Keep in mind that if all this sounds strange to you, it is also strange to quantum physicists themselves. In the absence of a unified field theory, which may be developed some time in the next several decades, quantum physicists are primarily concerned with the how — not the why — of such phenomena.

Many scientific experiments have confirmed that particles can indeed act this way. For instance, a single electron in wave mode can be shot at an impenetrable wall or barrier with two holes in it, and will actually verifiably go through both holes simultaneously. Similarly, an electron in wave mode, positioned in front of an impenetrable barrier, can literally jump through the barrier as if it weren't there. First, as a wave, it inhabits locations on both sides of the barrier. Then it resumes normal behavior as a corpuscle solely inhabiting its location on the opposite side of the barrier.

Moreover, if a particle inhabits two (or more) separate locations simultaneously, abandoning the first and resuming behavior as a corpuscle at the more distant location produces an instantaneous jump from point to point and without traversing the intervening space. Although the distances involved are tiny, this instant jump represents speed in excess of the speed of light. This does not violate Einstein's law that nothing can exceed the speed of light (since all additional energy of momentum at that speed is converted entirely into mass) because this speed limit refers specifically to motion through space. Particles in wave mode get around this (on a tiny scale) not by going faster through space but by skipping the space.

The notion that a particle can pass through an impenetrable barrier by initially inhabiting both sides of the barrier as a transdimensional wave or cloud of probability is not just theoretical. For instance, a "tunnel diode" is an inexpensive off-the-shelf electronic component you can buy at any good Radio Shack that performs a useful electronic function by forcing an electron to "tunnel" or jump across an impenetrable barrier in the only way it can — by assuming wave function. In short, quantum physics is already out of the

laboratory and into consumer electronics. It also plays a role in the science of many other commercial and industrial areas, such as lasers. And quantum physics is now being employed in new, blindingly fast experimental computers (see Newsday, Wednesday, August 16, 2000, p. A49 — "IBM Makes a Quantum Leap," by Ilan Greenberg).

Because distortion of the dimensions of matter on the subatomic level is so strange to most people, it may help to look at it in the context of Big Bang theory. According to Big Bang theory, because of their immense weight and gravity, all the galaxies and other matter in the universe collapsed into a central point — an event sometimes called "the Big Crunch." From there the universe exploded outward — "the Big Bang." (One of the objectives of the canceled Superconducting Super Collider was to simulate, on a very limited scale, conditions inside the Big Bang.)

Prominent theoretical physicist, Michio Kaku, of the City University of New York, has described the Big Bang in detail in a cover story for Astronomy, America's best-selling astronomy magazine (May '96 issue — "What Happened Before the Big Bang," by Michio Kaku, p. 34). According to Kaku, just before the Big Bang the gravity, pressure and heat inside the collapsed universe were so great that not only was the universe crushed but even, were crushed, the very dimensions of the universe themselves, which were shattered, briefly, into many more dimensions than we have now. The extra dimensions were unstable and decayed, leaving, at the time of the Big Bang, the four dimensions we have today. States Kaku,



"For the past 50 years a cold war has existed between general relativity [Einstein's theory] and quantum theory; each theory has developed independently of the other, and each has had unparalleled success as long as it has stayed within its domain. However, the two theories must necessarily collide at the instant of the big bang, when gravitational forces and temperatures were so fierce...At these energies, Einstein's theory becomes useless and quantum theory takes over. Quantum effects overwhelm general relativity at a temperature of 10 to the 32nd kelvins."



Kelvin is a temperature scale like Fahrenheit or Celsius, favored by scientists. Kaku is saying that at the beginning of the universe, the universe followed the laws of the inside of the atom — the quantum microcosm. Some scientists have described the beginning of the universe as a single, super-heavy "primeval atom." (For a lengthy discussion of this "primeval atom" read Steven Hawking's Universe: The Cosmos Explained by David Filkin, with a foreword by physicist Stephen Hawking — viewed by many as the world's greatest scientist.) Once the Big Bang occurred, the universe was shattered into a sea of particles that coalesced into the atoms that make up the universe we see today. In effect, the atoms of today can be viewed as "fossil remains" of the original primeval atom, and their dimensional distortions today can also be viewed as "fossils" of the original primeval dimensional disruptions. This helps explain why the subatomic realm today exhibits dimensional distortions, even though quantum physics, in the absence of a rigorous unified field theory, is primarily concerned with how.

Now, what if a piece of technology could be constructed that would bridge the two realms, the microcosm and the macrocosm? Imagine a machine that could transfer the strange, transdimensional properties of subatomic particles to large everyday objects like cars, planes, people, house pets. The implications for industry and, as we shall see, for government surveillance, would be staggering.

In 1935, one of the great giants of quantum mechanics, Austrian physicist Erwin Schrodinger, proposed a laboratory experiment that would, in fact, lend the quantum properties of wave function to large everyday objects. Schrodinger, who played a pivotal role as one of the founding fathers of the entire field of quantum physics, proposed linking subatomic particles in a series of steps to the larger macrocosmic domain. The experiment went like this: A highly radioactive atom with a 50—50 chance of disintegrating in an hour is placed in a sealed box in such a manner that any particles released in the disintegration of the atom exhibit a superposition of multiple states. Because of this superposition, during the hour the radioactive atom is actually in a state of having disintegrated and not disintegrated simultaneously. Next, Schrodinger proposed placing a sensor in the box to note this disintegration. The sensor in turn would be linked to a mechanical device it would trigger that would cause a container of poison gas to be smashed if the sensor were activated. Finally, Schrodinger proposed one additional component to his experiment: An ordinary house cat, which would also be placed in the box.

According to Schrodinger, in theory, since the atom is in a state of having decayed and not decayed simultaneously, the sensor should be in a state of being activated and not activated simultaneously, the poison gas should be in a state of having been released and not released simultaneously and — in theory, the cat, a macrocosmic object, should be in a state of being dead and alive simultaneously.

This experiment, famously called "Schrodinger's cat," has been discussed in scientific journals for decades. For technical reasons it would not have worked and Schrodinger proposed the experiment merely in order to illustrate the dilemma of bridging the gap between human-scale reality and the quantum reality he helped to define. In effect, Schrodinger was using his proposed experiment to ask a question: Why do subatomic particles act so odd? Why can't larger objects act the same way? Having explained the "how" much better than the "why," Schrodinger was expressing his frustration and bewilderment with the field to which he contributed so much. He even once complained to a colleague, "I am sorry that I ever had anything to do with quantum theory."

Schrodinger might have lamented less if he had known what other scientists would later do with his proposed experiment. In recent years, physicists have successfully performed a series of exotic laboratory experiments in which objects much larger than subatomic particles, even as large as several thousand atoms though much smaller than a cat, were made to exhibit the plural wave behavior of individual subatomic particles. These experiments have been described in Scientific American (June, '97 issue, p. 124) in an article entitled, "Bringing Schrodinger's Cat to Life." Since its author, Philip Yam, is a staff writer for the magazine, not a guest writer, the article carries the weight of the magazine as a whole. (See also Popular Mechanics, October '97, p. 34, "Executing Schrodinger's Cat," by the magazine's science/technology editor, Jim Wilson.)

Separately, scientific journals and The New York Times have reported on an unusual experiment conducted in Lyon, France, in which a photon — a particle of light — was split into two photons each having half the energy of the original photon. The two photons were then sent down two adjacent fiber optic cables that at the end diverged by a distance of seven miles. At the end of the line, one of the photons was forced to veer off in a new direction. The other photon was not similarly constrained. However, at the end of its line, the other photon actually mimicked the behavior of the first, heading off in the same new direction, showing that, in accordance with quantum principles, the two photons behaved as a single photon inhabiting two different places — even though separated by a staggering seven miles.

One of the strangest features of quantum physics is the well-established fact that a particle in wave mode loses its wave behavior and reverts back to being a corpuscle the moment you observe it. This bizarre property helps explain Schrodinger's consternation with the field he did so much to create.

The above-mentioned Scientific American article offers a solution to this strange mystery. Observing a particle always involves interacting with it, by bombarding it with other particles such as photons (particles of light). All particles possess at least a tiny amount of mass and therefore a gravitational field. The article gives the view of one of the world's leading scientists, physicist and mathematician Roger Penrose, of Oxford University in England, that what triggers the transition between wave mode and corpuscle mode is gravity. We will soon see how important this statement is for physics — and for C.I.A. surveillance technology — with shattering implications for 9/11.

Adding to the significance of the statement is the identity of its author, Penrose. We stated above that Stephen Hawking is viewed by many as the world's greatest scientist. His contributions to physics have been popularized in the public television series, "Stephen Hawking's Universe." (The above-mentioned book of the same title, by David Filkin, was the authorized companion volume to the TV series.) Hawking's critical work involved applying Einstein's formulas to the early universe with fundamental comparisons to the compressed state of black holes. This work established Hawking as an inheritor of the legacy of Einstein. Most significantly, Penrose, the leading black hole theorist, applying Einstein's formulas to black holes, was the key collaborator with Hawking on his crucial work. This lends particular importance to Penrose' assertion that it is gravity that triggers the transition between wave mode and corpuscle mode. (Again, Penrose' assertion tells the "how," not the "why," of wave function.) The statement may, in fact, be the most critically important statement of modern science, as we shall see.

In 1989 a physicist named Robert Scott Lazar, who had worked at Los Alamos National Laboratory, appeared on KLAS—TV in Las Vegas, Nevada, and told that he had worked on an ultra-secret U.S. government project under the control of U.S. intelligence, at a site called "S—4," walking distance south of Area 51 in southern Nevada (and referred to in secret government documents as part of the Area 51 complex). According to Lazar, the project he worked on involved engineering aircraft that employed a gravity-like field to make the entire aircraft assume wave function like a single subatomic particle and move thousands of feet in a single instantaneous jump — skipping, not passing through, the intervening space — thus facilitating blinding speed. Additionally, an eye witness who observed test flights of this craft in the vicinity of Area 51 supplied the media with a video of the test, which was broadcast nationally, and it shows exactly the behavior described by Lazar — jumps from point to point in spurts, completely skipping the intervening space. (Of course, such a craft would render the Strategic Defense Initiative obsolete. With such blinding speed an aircraft could zip out to an incoming missile well before it reached the U.S. and from there, keeping pace with it, it could be destroyed even with an old fashioned shotgun or the like. Such speed would also make it easier to check out decoys early.)

Making matters even more interesting, Lazar said he had originally been interviewed for the job at S—4 by Dr. Edward Teller, the father of the H-bomb. Teller subsequently put his foot in his mouth — deep — by making a non-denial denial, saying merely that he didn't remember Lazar.

In light of Lazar's claims and other leaks that add to and corroborate his detailed assertions and descriptions of the technology, here is how the craft — a Schrodinger's cat device — works: To begin with, it would be extremely difficult to produce large amounts of gravity without huge quantities of mass. But there is another force in nature, similar to gravity that, like gravity, attracts without regard to positive and negative magnetic charge, that can be easily produced in a small nuclear reactor. It is called — and this is the technical name — "the strong nuclear force" (as opposed to other, weakly interacting forces, magnetism and so on). The strong nuclear force is what holds the nucleus of an atom together and it is thus the main form of energy released in an atom bomb explosion. Without the strong nuclear force, the protons in the nuclei of atoms would fly apart because they are all positively charged and like charges repel, as anyone can see with the magnets on his refrigerator, when like ends are placed together. The strong nuclear force is also released in a fission nuclear reactor, but the challenge is to control this release very precisely.

Nikola Tesla offered a way to do this. Most science-minded people are familiar with Nikola Tesla, the Serbian-born American scientist and competitor of inventor Thomas Edison. Edison's work originated the General Electric Company. Tesla's work played a key role in the rise of the Westinghouse Corporation. Tesla was also the inventor of the induction motor — the type of electric motor today commonly used in thousands of applications. Tesla also did experiments to ionize the atmosphere — today the objective of the federal government's HAARP project. Thus, history — and the U.S. government — have shown high regard for Tesla's ideas and legacy.

One of Tesla's most unusual ideas was his assertion that extremely intense electromagnetic fields could be used to manipulate gravity. Normally, magnetism and gravity remain in their own separate worlds. But coming from Tesla the idea has to be taken seriously.

According to Lazar, the technology he worked on employed extremely powerful electromagnets to manipulate the strong nuclear force (SNF) emanating from a small reactor. The SNF functioned as a substitute for gravity, a kind of ersatz gravity and the electromagnets channeled it into a series of beams that coalesced at a single point thousands of feet ahead of the craft. This produced an oblong cloud of probability that extended from the craft to a point far ahead of the craft. When the beams of strong nuclear force were then shut off, the craft was forced to resume a single location, preferentially choosing the more distant location because the beams of the SNF had been focused there.

It is important to understand that Roger Penrose described gravity's action on quantum behavior as operating in what could be called the "wrong direction." That is, according to Penrose, gravity has the effect of stifling wave function and reverting to corpuscle behavior. But the objective is to influence the behavior of a large object in the opposite way — to promote macrocosmic wave function, not stifle it. Thus, the craft can not merely emit beams of the SNF per se, but must do so in a manner that works at cross purposes with gravity, more or less "shorting out" gravity (to borrow a term). Importantly, other government leaks besides Lazar's describe a very complex expression of fields emanating from the craft, with the electromagnetic fields rapidly rotating and oscillating. Lazar himself said the SNF produced by the craft is "out of phase" with normal gravity, proceeding in a "longitudinal propagation" (i.e. — beam-like) in a direction varying up to 180 degrees from the direction of the Earth's gravity. The purpose is not to make the craft buoyant, although that is a secondary effect, but to disrupt normal gravity enough that wave function is initiated. It is this wave function that facilitates blinding speed.

It is not unheard of that a force can be used against itself in this way. Just to give a very loose analogy, even sound can be used to stifle sound. For instance, there is a company called Noise Cancellation Technologies that sells a machine that contains a computer capable of analyzing repetitive sound such as factory noise or the sound of a helicopter. The machine then emits its own sound pattern that is the exact reverse of the irritating factory noise — for every high pressure wave it produces a low pressure wave and vice versa — a trough for every crest — thus perfectly complementing and canceling out the noise. Even the deafening noise of a helicopter is silenced in this way. Noise is not gravity and the analogy can only be carried so far. But noise cancellation illustrates the use of a force to stifle itself, which occurs, in a different way, in the craft on which Lazar worked.


And now we come to the most intellectually challenging part of our subject. Up till now we have discussed wave function essentially as a distortion of space. In fact, it is more than that. We said that according to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle the more accurately you pin down the speed of an electron, the more indeterminate and plural becomes its location. And vice versa: The more accurately you pin down the location of an electron, the more indeterminate and plural becomes its speed.

But what is speed? Speed is defined as distance times time (e.g. — 35 miles per hour). Thus, whenever we speak of speed we are considering time as a factor. This implies that the dimensional distortions associated with wave function and related phenomena involve not only distortions of space, but also of time.

Time distortion is extremely evident in wave function. The very notion that the potential and actual are transposed, that the potential behaves during wave mode as if it were tangible and actual, places time distortion at the forefront of wave function. "Potential" isn't about the present. "Potential" is all about the future. Potential concerns what hasn't happened yet. As in our analogy to a trip to Aunt Matilda's house, a particle inhabiting a point in advance of a fork in its path and simultaneously inhabiting locations further ahead along both forks, with the potential to go down either fork, is behaving as if it already happened, as if it already went down both forks. This shows that during wave function not only space but time is acting plural and multitudinous. In other words, every subatomic particle, as a kind of fossil remain of the dimensional stresses of the Big Bang, frequently acts as its own time machine — naturally. During wave function the apparent tangible presence of a particle in nearby locations to which it merely has the potential to visit indicates that the particle is simultaneously inhabiting multiple, adjacent overlapping moments in time.

This point goes far beyond mere speculative musing, what H. G. Wells once called "that luxurious after dinner hour when thoughts run free of the trammels of precision." Rigorous scientific work has been done on time distortion. For instance, the great and oft-quoted physicist Richard Feynman won the Albert Einstein Medal and the Nobel Prize in physics for his work establishing that antimatter is what it is because for it, time is going backwards. Antimatter is matter in which a particle's behavior, particularly its charge, is reversed. For instance, electrons are normally negatively charged. An antimatter electron would be positively charged. Antimatter is not science fiction. Scientists have managed in the laboratory to make antimatter versions of almost all known particles. And antimatter electrons, more commonly called positrons, are used in industry. For instance, a PET scan machine, a hospital diagnostic tool, uses positrons. ("PET" stands for "Positron Emission Tomography.") And Feynman won the Nobel Prize in physics for his work on the reversal of time that attends antimatter particles — that time is literally going backwards inside an antimatter particle.

Equally intriguing are the dates of the awards Feynman received for his work. His Nobel Prize was granted in 1965 and he received his Albert Einstein Medal in 1953. Thus, important, major scientific work on time distortion goes back at least half a century. Serious work on the physics and permutation of time has been going on — for a long, long time.

According to Robert Scott Lazar, the former Los Alamos physicist who worked on and spilled the beans in 1989 on U.S. intelligence's Schrodinger's cat technology at Area 51/S—4, there is a separate project that is an offshoot of the project Lazar worked on, called Project Looking Glass, whose stated objective is to research the physics of looking back through time. Lazar said he was actually given briefing papers to read on Project Looking Glass. Certainly, looking back through time could, for instance, make it possible for investigators to acquire an image of the face of a terrorist before he blew himself to bits, or mailed an anthrax-laced letter. The path of an anthrax-laced letter could be followed back in stages to the mailbox where and when it was first mailed. But establishing a connection, technologically, between two separate moments in time holds for U.S. intelligence a much more ambitious prospect — looking forward in time — and you can be sure this is their primary objective.

Lazar himself said that, when standing under the craft on which he worked, there was apparent a tremendous time distortion — consistent with the temporal aspect of wave function. The work of Lazar's own project clearly influenced this offshoot project. Lazar did not directly work on Project Looking Glass, but the technology would operate something like this: The strong nuclear force would be controlled and manipulated in a manner similar to the way it was manipulated in Lazar's craft, but the beams of the SNF would not be focused on a distant location. Instead they would be focused inward into the center of a vacuum test chamber. Without a spatially elongated cloud of probability the primary effect of the cloud of probability produced would be temporal, not spatial.

Also directed into the center of the test chamber would be a stream of electrons at regular intervals, say, one every second. During some seconds no electron would be directed into the chamber. Thus, the presence or lack of presence of an electron each second would represent information — the ones and zeros of computer code. An enlarged cloud of probability would form around each electron. Each electron's wave function would extend a short way backward in time, e.g., ten minutes. Thus, each electron, or evidence of its presence, would be detectable in the chamber ten minutes earlier — and the electrons would be detectable in the same sequence. The resulting effect would be the transmission of information back through time. Once the information was received it could be resent another ten minutes further back. In this way information could be sent "hopscotch" fashion even days back through time. Any information could be sent this way — even the text of the news sections of the September 12, 2001 edition of The Washington Post.

Thus, the technology would work retroactively, making it possible after an attack to always give warning prior to the attack — the ultimate answer to Pearl Harbor. In short, Project Looking Glass is the biggest secret in the United States government — and you have no right not to know about it.





For over two and a half years this project has taken on for me a special significance because the Central Intelligence Agency has been using quantum-based surveillance technology on me in an effort to terrorize me into silence about my relative's illegal intelligence activities. As I shall outline below, over and over and over — for more than two and a half years — operatives of the Central Intelligence Agency have approached me and dropped to me glaring hints that they had advance — not concurrent — knowledge of my movements and activities — activities concerning which I had not yet made any advance preparations whatsoever and about which I had not yet told a soul. The intended effect was intimidation — a demonstration of prowess. These operatives also repeatedly dropped verbal hints and other explicit suggestions that they could, in fact, manipulate time.

It would be comforting and sensible to think they were lying. Two and a half years of shocking events disabused me of such wishful thinking. I came to have contempt for these egotistical over-aged panty-raiders with their high-tech toys and their infantile attitude that they were the masters and creators of natural forces they merely manipulated. These people wanted to astound and terrorize me. At best you could say I was shaken, not stirred. And my contempt rose a lot on 9/11 when I watched the C.I.A. stand idly by while possessing an early-warning technology that they had just spent over two and a half years using on me for the most pathetically petty purpose of harassing and irritating me, at, I am sure, staggering taxpayer expense. These people lack the maturity to handle such technology, which must be placed under the strictest control of Congress. And a little American "glasnost" — "openness" with the American people — would also help. Of course, if that ever happened, the families of thousands of car crash victims would file the biggest class action lawsuit in history...

Here are some examples of how the C.I.A. used quantum surveillance on me: In 1999 a strange thing happened to me. A government informant who had previously snooped on me repeatedly, approached me out of the blue and with a creepy little smile said in a slow, mysterious voice, "you don't have to hide it from me..." I had never seen him before in my neighborhood, always instead in a shopping area three subway stops away. In fact, less than five minutes before this odd encounter I had stepped into a men's room and alone in the room, locked the door and then placed some excess money I was carrying into my shoe as a prudent safeguard against being mugged. I had not previously been in that men's room in many months, perhaps even a year or two. Yet this informant seemed to have unusual knowledge of what I had just done in privacy. If I had frequented that men's room, the political voyeurs in the C.I.A. could have placed a small video camera in that men's room. But I had not been in that men's room in many months.

Making this incident more interesting, I had just come back from a brief trip to Washington to complain to people on Capitol Hill about the C.I.A. harassment I was experiencing because of the knowledge I possess about the crimes committed by my relative in the C.I.A. In order to evade surveillance on that trip, I had left my building in the middle of the night through a circuitous route that avoided my building's normal entrances and exits. This route took me over a short spiked fence and I had momentarily placed a one-foot segment of steel pipe with holes along one side over the spikes on the top of the fence, to make it easier to climb over without tearing my suit. The pipe was heavy and in any case I didn't want an unnecessary hassle with uptight security people searching my belongings upon entering the Capitol Hill complex. So I hid the pipe in the woods of a New York park before taking the train to Washington.

Thus, coming immediately on the heels of this brief trip to Washington, the informant's strange utterance, "you don't have to hide it from me" took on a double meaning. The C.I.A. should not

posted by Yehuda  # 11:25 PM